Sunday, October 31, 2010

A CONTROVERSY OVER BIHAR ELECTION:

A CONTROVERSY OVER BIHAR ELECTION-2010:
By Ashutosh

These days, the Bihar elections are one of the most discussed topics across the country. Many political parties are trying their best to come into power for the next five years. Among the frontrunners is six-time Lok Sabha MP Nitish Kumar, leading the Janata Dal (U) in alliance with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), a combination popularly known as “Rajag”.

At the same time, RJD (Rashtriya Janata Dal) and LJP (Lok Janshakti Party) have also joined forces, making the contest more interesting. And since we’re talking about Bihar—where anything can happen—it’s worth sharing what I personally feel about the situation.

Ground Reality in Bihar

We often hear that around 75% of India’s population still lives in villages, and yet there’s a widespread belief that people in Bihar are illiterate. Sadly, I agree to an extent. When I last visited my hometown during college holidays, I had conversations with several people, including a close friend, about Bihar’s political situation. At that time, RJD had recently lost power, and JD(U) was in charge.

What shocked me was when my friend said,

“Lalu Prasad’s government was better than the current one.”

I asked him how he could compare the two, but he didn’t have any strong reason. I, on the other hand, gave him several reasons why the current government was doing better. For the record, I don’t support any party blindly—I support the party that works for the people.

Lalu Prasad had 15 years in power. If he couldn’t bring positive change in that much time, how long should people wait? It's not just about investing money—it’s about ensuring that the funds reach the grassroots level.

What do the people of Bihar really want?
Simple:

  1. Water (not a huge issue in most rural areas),

  2. Electricity, and

  3. Good roads.

Everyone knows Bihar still struggles with electricity—even Patna, the state capital, faces frequent power cuts. So you can imagine the situation in rural areas.

That leaves roads as the third major concern. If roads are built properly, and transportation is improved, most people will be happy. Along with that, education standards need to be raised, and law and order must be maintained across the state.

The Voting Reality

In Bihar, caste-based voting—especially from lower castes and Muslims—plays a significant role. Unfortunately, many people in villages don’t have enough awareness to make informed decisions. They often vote for whoever their local leader or influential figure tells them to.

Sometimes, for as little as ₹200–400, their votes are bought.
But let me be clear—this doesn’t happen in every case.

In many places, mostly lower-caste communities come out to vote. Some people vote just for the experience of pressing the EVM button and hearing the beep sound.

I remember from my childhood that even upper-caste people used to actively vote. But nowadays, that number has reduced. Many say things like:

“Why should I vote? What will they give me in return?”

This mindset has affected voter turnout among certain groups.

Hope for a Better Government

Whatever the outcome, I genuinely hope that the upcoming government, no matter who forms it, works for the betterment of Bihar and focuses on long-term development.

Thank you for reading my blog.
Please remember—this is my personal opinion, and I don’t claim to be always right. I would love to hear your views and thoughts on this topic as well.

Drop your comments below, and don’t forget to follow my blog for more!

Thanks & Good night.

Regards,
Ashutosh


Saturday, October 30, 2010

WHO WAS "CROOK"?

WHO WAS “CROOK”?:
(A comment on the movie Crook)

I just watched the movie Crook, starring Emraan Hashmi and Neha Sharma. The first thing I’d like to mention is that this was only the second Emraan Hashmi film I’ve ever watched. The first one was Good Boy, Bad Boy, and I’ve only seen bits of Jannat. Honestly, I had avoided his movies because of some not-so-great past experiences with his work.

Now, coming to the point—Crook turned out to be quite entertaining. Everyone played their roles sincerely, but Emraan Hashmi’s character, Jay, was particularly challenging and interesting. True to his usual style, he started flirting right from the beginning. And let’s be honest—his face naturally gives off that flirtatious vibe, doesn’t it? He’s really getting the kind of roles that suit his personality.

The movie began with a powerful line:
“Agar aap Allah ke bachche ki madad karoge, to Allah aapki madad zaroor karega.”
(If you help God’s children, then God will definitely help you in return.)

Now, let’s talk about the central issue in the movie—why were Indians being attacked in Australia? Do you think the film showed the truth? That Indians go there just to have fun or marry Australians for PR (permanent residency)? Personally, I don’t believe that’s the whole story. Let me share my perspective.

There’s one thing about us Indians—wherever we go, we try to shape that place according to our own culture, values, and sometimes, our dominance. Yes, there’s a tendency for dadagiri (bossy behavior). But there’s another major factor—Indians are generally more hardworking than workers in many other countries. And we’re often willing to work for lower salaries. Since the pay is in dollars, euros, or other foreign currencies, we feel it’s a great deal. But from the local’s point of view, it’s not ideal. They’re not ready to work for low wages, and as a result, companies prefer hiring more Indians and fewer locals.

This causes frustration among locals, who think,
“If these Indians take all our jobs, what will we do?”
So, unfortunately, some of them started retaliating through violence. That’s not right. The world should value talent—not nationality. Australians should accept this reality. Ironically, while these things are happening abroad, similar discrimination happens right here within India, though for different reasons.

Coming back to the movie—the girl’s actions were justified, and she eventually succeeded in her goals. Her brother’s role, however, didn’t sit well with me. Although his reactions were relatable under those circumstances, in the end, his choices were wrong. So yes, we could call him the real “Crook.”

Thank you for reading my blog. Feel free to leave your comments and share your thoughts on Crook. Do you agree with my views? Let me know!

Good night, and stay tuned for my next blog!


Regards,
Ashutosh.

Friday, October 29, 2010

TEACHING METHODOLOGY

Teacher, Lecturer, or Professor – Who Are They Really?

By Ashutosh

First of all, let me ask you something—do you know the difference between a Teacher, a Lecturer, and a Professor? Are all their roles the same? I know the profession sounds similar—they all teach students—but if that’s the case, why do we have three different titles?

Think about it.

Based on my understanding:

  • A Teacher is someone who provides education at the grassroots level, typically in schools.

  • A Lecturer leads research groups, supervises research students, and teaches at higher levels, often in colleges.

  • A Professor—derived from the Latin word professus, meaning someone who professes to be an expert—is the highest-ranking teacher in a university or college.

Wikipedia also defines it similarly.

My Experience With Teaching and Teachers

Now let me come to the main point—teaching methodologies and what teaching should actually be.

To be honest, my experience with teaching at the B.E. (Bachelor of Engineering) level has been quite disappointing. Before joining engineering, I had great respect for people in the teaching profession. My father is a teacher at a middle school, and I’ve seen his dedication firsthand. Till class 10, I never went for tuition—my father taught me all subjects himself. He teaches Physics and Math and was my first teacher whose teaching I could grasp easily in just one go.

Then in class 12, while studying in Patna, I had another great teacher—Professor I.D. Chauhan, who taught me Chemistry. His teaching style left a lasting impression on me.

But everything changed after I joined engineering. Here, very few truly resemble the title of "Lecturer" or "Professor." Out of many, only 2–3 faculty members from our branch seem genuinely passionate and knowledgeable.

What I’ve observed is that those who are actually good often join as freshers and leave after gaining some experience. For example, in my first semester, a newly joined lecturer Mr. Kiran Kumar T began his teaching journey with our batch. He was skilled, had a good command over his subject, and most importantly, knew how to teach.

Because here’s the harsh truth—knowledge alone is not enough. Many lecturers have good subject knowledge, but no teaching skills. A classic example from my college is from the 5th semester when we had the subject VLSI (Very Large Scale Integration) Design. Our professor was very talented, but he struggled to engage the class.

Some Just Don’t Care

Sadly, many others are not even interested in teaching. They just come to college, pass the time, and take home ₹40,000 a month. There’s no passion, no dedication—just a job.

And students? They can’t even raise their voices. Why? Because we’re afraid. Afraid of marks being cut. Afraid of being failed in internals or end-semester exams. There's an unspoken rule in colleges:

Never mess with a teacher, or you might not pass—even in 8 years.

So students choose silence. We follow along quietly, even if the teaching is terrible.

A Real Incident From Our Class

Let me share an actual incident. We were having a Digital Switching System (DSS) class. Some students were talking, some were sleepy, and the class had become noisy. The madam got angry and left the class, saying,

“Talk to HOD Sir. I won’t take this class or give attendance until then.”

Now here’s the twist—our HOD was on long leave, so the acting head was Mr. Mallikarjun, someone who’d already walked out of class back in the 2nd semester when he was teaching Basic Electrical. Back then, we had apologized, and things were sorted out.

This time again, we had to talk to Mallikarjun sir. The madam had said if we didn’t, she wouldn’t allow us to write the 3rd internal or even the external lab exams.

So all of us—including the girls—decided to go to the staff room with a notebook, just in case they asked us to write a statement or feedback. But when we reached, someone said,

“Sir has gone for a smoke.”
(Yes, unfortunately, this is common among some lecturers.)

So I left to grab breakfast with friends. When we returned, the so-called “meeting” had already started—a meeting between devils and devils, as it felt.

We stood in line. Mallikarjun sir asked,

“What’s the problem? Why are you always making noise in class?”

But no one responded. I asked my friend if I should speak. His response:

“Better keep your mouth shut.”

So I listened to the entire 25-minute monologue quietly. In the end, another madam asked us all to apologize.

As expected, we all said in unison:
“Sorry, ma’am…”
Then we headed to our next class—CMOS.

But Why Were Students Sleepy or Disinterested?

I really wanted to tell Mallikarjun sir the truth—students were bored or misbehaving because the class wasn’t engaging. That madam couldn’t make the subject interesting. If she had been able to connect with students, such problems wouldn’t arise.

A True Teacher Knows Theory and Practice

A great teacher, lecturer, or professor must have both theoretical and practical knowledge.

Last night, while talking with my father, he recalled his own teacher training period. He was sent to multiple schools to observe real-time teaching and understand the profession through practice—not just theory.

He told me:

“Practical knowledge is the key to success. Without it, you don’t deserve to be called an ENGINEER.”

I understand this line deeply. That’s why I’m more inclined toward research—because I value learning that’s real and applicable.

My Message to All Future Teachers

At last, I want to share a humble message to all Teachers, Lecturers, Professors, and students who are interested in this noble profession:

“Don’t choose teaching just as a profession—choose it out of genuine interest.”

Only then will you be truly valued—by students, by fellow teachers, and by society.

Thank you for reading this blog. Please share your comments, thoughts, or feedback—and stay tuned for my next post.

May God bless everyone.
Good night.

Regards,
Ashutosh


Thursday, October 28, 2010

SOCIETY-"A BIG PROBLEM"


SOCIETY- “A BIG PROBLEM”:

A society is generally known as a place where a certain group of people live peacefully and support one another. According to Wikipedia, "A society is a group of people related to each other through persistent relations such as social status, roles, etc." However, this definition seems less relevant today. Ironically, the biggest enemy of any society now appears to be the society itself. People in society have become overly polite on the surface, but in reality, most are double-minded and self-centered.

This problem is especially evident in rural areas like villages. In such places, people usually don't think beyond their household matters. Many women in these regions often believe that no one is as smart or capable as they are—I say this from personal experience. People are highly rooted in their religious beliefs. Whenever they find themselves lacking knowledge or awareness in certain areas, they use religion and so-called "discipline" as a shield. I’ve spent about 16 years of my life in my village, and I can still observe what’s happening there.

If I start describing my village in detail, it would sound like a horror story. Unfortunately, I believe this is now the reality of many rural areas.

Ten years ago, those who had no power are now considered powerful—and without fear or accountability. Ideally, in a society, everyone should help one another. But that’s not the case anymore. Many people feel jealous when they see others progressing. The social environment in villages is deteriorating. Some people waste money on luxuries, while others nearby are still struggling to eat even one full meal a day. In multi-caste villages, upper castes often hate lower castes—and the feeling is mutual.

In my own village, unity is completely missing. Even within the Brahmin caste, there is no sense of respect or solidarity. The rules within this caste are extremely strict—inter-caste marriage is not accepted at all. If someone chooses to marry outside their caste, they are either forced to leave the society or are treated like outcasts, as if they have committed a sin. When I visited home during my third-semester break, I found that even the older women in my neighborhood held the same mindset. However, after having a conversation with them, I believe I was able to change the thinking of at least a few of them.

But let’s be honest—a single person cannot change the mindset of the entire world.

In villages, if something goes wrong in one family, it becomes public news within 15 minutes—not just in that village, but also in 4–5 neighboring ones. Sadly, instead of helping one another, the society often pulls people down. Let me share an example: I saw a family with six daughters and a very poor father. Only one daughter had been married. When a marriage proposal came for the second daughter and everything was almost finalized, it was revealed that the groom was physically disabled—he had one leg affected—but he had a stable government job.

As soon as this news broke, the entire village started gossiping. “How can that girl marry a handicapped man?” “What kind of father would agree to this?” You know how rumors spread—small matters turn into major controversies. But let me ask—what was the real problem here? The marriage was ideal. No dowry was involved, and the girl’s family was financially weak. Did they have the luxury of demanding a perfect groom with a great job, unless they were ready to pay a huge dowry in lakhs?

If they needed financial support, society should have come forward to help. But instead, when asked for cooperation, everyone stayed silent. However, if the father tried to sell a piece of land to afford the wedding, the same people would rush in to buy it at a bargain, claiming, “Sell it to me, I’ll pay immediately!”

So I ask you—what kind of society are we talking about?

I don’t want to write more on this topic now. You can draw your own conclusions.

Wait for my next blog. And don’t forget to leave your comments!


Thanks ……

Regards,
Ashutosh.

    

Wednesday, October 27, 2010

ENGLISH VERSUS HINDI


ENGLISH VERSUS HINDI

Unfortunately, the status of English in India has become inseparably linked with that of Hindi—often in ways that are confusing and controversial. Today, it seems to be a constant debate of Hindi versus English.

This has turned into a long-standing issue, particularly between North and South India. It’s strange that while many promote English, no one openly says it should come at the cost of Hindi. After all, Hindi is the language of the majority—something English can never truly be. That should be clear.

National Language or Foreign Influence?

English can never be the national language of India, simply because it doesn't represent the masses. Hindi, on the other hand, is spoken widely and belongs to India’s cultural identity.

Another reason people often criticize English is that it’s still seen as a foreign language—a leftover from colonial rule.

When I came to Karnataka, I realized that very few people here understand or speak Hindi. That in itself wasn’t a big issue. The real challenge was that Kannada is the official state language, and in many places, not knowing it creates real difficulties—especially when reading signs, asking for help, or navigating public services.

Language and National Unity

Interestingly, even some of India’s most important competitive exams—like IIT-JEE, IAS, and other civil services—offer papers in both English and Hindi. This raises an important question:
If Hindi is supposed to be our national language, then why isn’t it universally accepted and promoted across all states?

Let me be clear—I'm not saying any particular language is bad or inferior. But I do believe that knowing Hindi should be seen as a basic necessity, especially for those moving across different parts of India. Not knowing Hindi in a Hindi-speaking region can leave people feeling like outsiders in their own country. Worse, they might be taken advantage of simply because they don’t understand the language.

Let’s not forget that in most Indian states, Hindi is either the official language or the most commonly spoken mother tongue.

One Positive Thing I Noticed

Despite the language barriers, one thing I truly appreciated during my stay in Karnataka is that the people here are very helpful and kind. Even if you don't speak the local language, they often go out of their way to assist you.

Thank you for reading.
Let me know your thoughts on this topic. Do you think Hindi should be promoted more? Or should English continue to dominate?

– Ashutosh

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

Beware of the Third Party – The Real Kaam Bigaaru

Beware of the Third Party – The Real Kaam Bigaaru

We often hear the term “third party” in the context of banking, insurance, or technical services. But that’s not what I’m referring to here. I'm talking about the third party that silently damages relationships—especially when it comes to love and personal bonds.

In Hindi, I like to describe such people with a simple, accurate term: “Kaam Bigaaru”—someone who disrupts or spoils things.

Why Do I Call Them Kaam Bigaaru?

Because that's exactly what they do—disturb your peace, break your trust, and complicate your life. You can probably find examples of such people in your surroundings or even your friend circle.

Let me share a real-life example.

Back in my 2nd semester, I met someone named Mr. Saurav, who later became my roommate. One day, he told me something that has stayed with me ever since:

“A third party will always affect your relationship—once you let them in.”

And he was absolutely right.

Real Example: The Apartment Couple

At that time, we were staying in a rented apartment. There was a couple living in the same building—they seemed to be in a happy relationship. About a month later, the girl’s two female friends moved to the city in search of jobs. Naturally, they stayed with her for a while.

Eventually, she introduced both of her friends to her boyfriend. Everything seemed normal at first. But as days passed, the boyfriend started spending more time with those two girls. He gradually got emotionally closer to one of them.

And then, as you might guess—he broke up with his girlfriend.
A few weeks later, he started dating one of her friends. They went from being friends to best friends, and eventually, boyfriend and girlfriend.

A Similar Story: My Friend Avinash

I saw the same thing happen to my best friend, Avinash. But this time, it was the other way around. In the earlier story, a girl introduced her friends to her boyfriend. In Avinash’s case, he introduced his girlfriend to one of his male friends. And the result? The same.

Over time, his friend became too close to his girlfriend. This led to misunderstandings, mistrust, and finally, a breakup.

So What’s the Lesson?

If you're ever planning to introduce someone—be it a friend—to your family, your partner, or someone close to your heart, be cautious.

Ask yourself:

  • Is this person truly trustworthy?

  • Is he/she polite and mature-minded—or double-faced and opportunistic?

If your gut says no, then maintain some distance.
Because not everyone you call a friend truly deserves that place in your life.

Thanks for reading!
Please leave your thoughts or share your own experience with a “third party” situation in the comments below. I’d love to hear from you.

Stay aware, and take care!

Monday, October 25, 2010

MY FIRST INVENTION -TRANSMITTER

FM TRANSMITTER DESIGN

There is a proverb:
"A person can do any work based on two principles—

  1. Self-interest in the subject,

  2. Fear."

For me, this project was never driven by fear. I had a genuine interest in the subject. I first heard about this fascinating instrument when I was around 14 years old, and since childhood, I’ve always been an inventive and curious kind of person.

I even tried to build this transmitter back in 12th grade, but at that time, I didn’t have enough knowledge about electronic circuits or the components involved in such designs.

Later, when I entered engineering, I chose the Electronics and Communication branch—following my passion. Now, in my third year, I’ve successfully built this project.

Before starting, many of my friends told me that it would be a very difficult project, but I didn’t back down. I began working on it as per my schedule, and after spending months in research and development, I successfully designed the transmitter circuit.

After studying all the components and doing the necessary calculations, I designed the layout on a Printed Circuit Board (PCB). The first time, I didn’t get any output or signal, but after further modifications and rework, I finally succeeded.

This FM transmitter circuit can transmit frequencies in the range of 87.5 MHz to 108 MHz, and its transmission range is approximately 500 meters.

circuit of the transmitter


This is first blog from me.....
                     regards
                    Ashutosh

Share

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More